Newzpix wrote:Who needs color?
While I suspect this is more of a rhetorical question I rise to the bait anyway..
As to shot, it is certainly a very nice shot and it does show the flowers on the tree nicely, but does it say “spring” as much as the same shot in color? To me, not so much and besides the theme was the
colors of spring not simply the form of spring which this shot seems more geared to…
You could always start a B&W of spring challenge and see if anyone rises to the occation, I certainly didn’t seem to have much luck with my idea,
As to who “needs” color…
Well, since you asked...
While I could go into a long dissertation as to the many advantages of seeing in color suffice it to say that since most higher forms of life have evolved the ability to see color, I'd have to say there seems to be a definite advantage to the ability to see in color, we use it constantly in our daily lives, it helps us tell good fruit from bad, when to pick the crops, when the meat on the grill is done, and so on and so on.
Not withstanding that for me spring is all about the emerging colors, its the primary clue, if you will, the speaks of the change from winter to spring. Certainly B&W studies have their own unique challenges, I see that as perhaps more appropriate to a fall foliage challenge where form and function would be the main theme of the photos, the leaves piling on the ground, the now bare branches casting their patterns against a stark gray sky, etc etc.
Back in the day when I did a lot of dark room work processing my own photos and doing enlargements I worked mostly in B&W not only because of the cost savings but because of time saving factor, but now with digital working in color is not any more expensive, at least as it remains digital and you are not printing large volumes of photos.
So to answer your question ,
you need color,
I need color, and personally I think the world would be much duller place without it.
Besides, I choose the theme so I can make it anything I want to!
RM