MABSTER wrote:RJP3579 wrote:Wow. I would have thought more people would vote. Thanks to those who did vote!
Yeah, me too. Roughly 10% is not too good.
Well statistically, wouldn't 20% been 82 and 20? etc...The numbers weren't close enough to have a huge impact on the outcome, right? Statistically speaking?
Just trying to learn a lil math here